Nollan v. california coastal commission dissent
Nollan v. California Coastal Commission483 U. S. 825, 107 S. Ct. 3141, 97 L. Ed. 2d 677, 26 ERC 1073 (1987) Dolan v. Dissent. The dissent holds that the condition does not amount to a taking because the Nollans proposed building blocks visual access, while the Commission seeks to preserve lateral access, and those two concerns are closelyNollan v. California Coastal Commission Dissent: it Is Private Landowners Who Are The Interlopers Justices Blackmun, Brennan, Stevens, and Marshall all dissented. Of the dissenting opinions, the one filed by Brennan, with which Marshall joined, was by far the longest and most forceful. Brennan urged greater flexibility for states to make nollan v. california coastal commission dissent
Nollan v. California Coastal Comission. Supreme Court of the United States, 1987. . 483 U. S. 825, 107 S. Ct. 3141, 97 L. Ed. 2d 677. Johnson, pp. . Facts: The Nollans own a beachfront property. They want to demolish the current house and built a new one. However, the California Coastal Commission says they must allow an easement for the public to get to the beach in order to get the permit.